In a market like Singapore, where the top three banks, DBS, OCBC, and UOB, control more than 90% of retail banking, the rise of a digital-only challenger is more than just unusual; it’s strategically significant. Trust Bank, launched in September 2022 as a joint venture between Standard Chartered and FairPrice Group, has rapidly reached more than 1 million customers as of early 2025. By user count, that makes it Singapore’s fourth-largest retail bank.

Incentive-driven scale

Trust’s key strategic decision was to prioritize distribution over disruption. By embedding itself in the FairPrice ecosystem, it sidestepped the expensive problem most digital banks face: acquiring trust and attention in an overcrowded digital environment.

FairPrice’s retail footprint meant Trust had immediate access to thousands of high-frequency physical touchpoints. At checkout counters, in-store promos, and membership rewards, Trust positioned itself not as a “new bank” but as a natural extension of everyday consumer behavior. For a digital-first offering, this physical linkage proved to be a powerful on-ramp.

The second major lever was incentive design. Trust’s customer acquisition strategy relied heavily on real-time rewards and referral mechanics. Nearly 70% of new users joined through referrals, with cashbacks, FairPrice Link points, and immediate sign-up perks forming the foundation of its early user funnel.

While this produced a steep growth curve, the quality of acquired customers remains unclear. In fintech growth accounting, rapid acquisition doesn’t always translate into long-term retention or monetization. Without public disclosures on active usage, cross-sell rates, or multi-product adoption, it’s hard to determine whether Trust has built a durable customer base or simply collected app installs.

Even in areas where engagement is reported, such as credit card usage, with over 20 transactions per user per month, key data like average spend size, repayment behavior, and credit yield remain unshared.

Efficient infrastructure, underutilized capital

From an operations standpoint, Trust is benefiting from its cloud-native technology stack. It has kept its cost base lean: in 2024, revenue surged 148%, while operating expenses rose only around 4%. Its losses narrowed to SGD 93 million, and the bank has stated its intent to reach profitability by the end of 2025. That projection, while ambitious, appears within reach based on the current cost trajectory.

However, a deeper look at the balance sheet reveals caution. Trust holds SGD 3.8 billion in deposits but has deployed only SGD 0.8 billion in loans. That puts its loan-to-deposit ratio at roughly 21%, far below industry norms. This may reflect an intentionally conservative risk posture common among new banks, but also suggests that Trust has yet to effectively monetize its deposit base.

Part of the challenge may lie in its product scope. While Trust offers a compelling savings account, credit card, and small-ticket personal loans (e.g., split-pay options), it lacks exposure to higher-yield or higher-value segments like mortgages, SME lending, or insurance. Its newly launched investment product, Trust Invest, lowers entry barriers to as little as SGD 100, but it is still early in its life cycle and will need time to generate meaningful AUM or fee-based revenue.

Retention is the metric that matters.

Trust’s position as the fourth-largest bank by customer count is a symbolic victory. It proves that digital-only banks can find scale even in hyper-concentrated markets provided they have strong partners, aggressive incentives, and operational agility. But scale is not a moat, and volume does not imply value.

To move beyond being a FairPrice-linked utility or rewards platform, Trust will need to deepen its financial relationship with users. That means increasing loan penetration, expanding into more complex financial products, and most importantly, retaining users without relying on extrinsic rewards.

It must also contend with incumbent responses. DBS, OCBC, and UOB are not ignoring this shift. They are heavily investing in their digital platforms and are capable of matching Trust in both convenience and pricing. With no current plans for regional expansion or unique intellectual property, Trust’s long-term success will depend on how well it can embed itself not just in people’s spending habits, but in their financial lives.

Conclusion

Trust Bank’s early success is undeniable. It identified a structural inefficiency in distribution, exploited it with precision, and scaled at a pace rarely seen in regulated financial markets. But this phase of the journey was the easy part: attracting customers with incentives and partnerships. What lies ahead is fundamentally harder.

Sustainable banking businesses are not built on sign-ups; they are built on capital deployment, pricing discipline, and customer monetization across multiple verticals. Trust’s low loan-to-deposit ratio, limited credit exposure, and nascent wealth offering suggest it has yet to prove its ability to generate meaningful economic value from its user base.

If Trust cannot evolve beyond a reward-led ecosystem and build defensible, recurring revenue from users who engage with it as a primary financial relationship, its current position in the market may prove transitory. The question isn’t whether it can grow; it already has. The question is whether it can matter in a market where incumbents are digitally capable, financially entrenched, and strategically reactive.

Enjoyed the read? Let’s take it further.

Connect to unlock exclusive insights, smart AI tools, and real connections that spark action.

Schedule a chat to unlock the full experience